Accountability-Central.com
Register here.  Forgot your password?  Remember me
HomeAbout The SiteRegistration InformationVoices: Featured Commentators and Bloggers  Special Sections
Search

Categories:

Featured Content


Slide10

Slide10

Slide10

Slide10

Slide10


NewsAndInfo

 



Click Here to Subscribe to our RSS Feed
 



Stories Below come from our Media Partner 3BL Media - Click their logo or any of the stories for more information


Executive Compensation, Trends, Executive Compensation Survey, Plans

Executive Compensation Introduction

Updated January 2011

The issues surrounding executive compensation – and especially CEO pay -- have been the topics of much discussion in Board Rooms,  at Annual Shareholder Meetings and in the media, After a decade of intense debate, efforts to control executive compensation ((under Federal Law)  took center stage when the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued interim final rules for reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the executive compensation standards of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in January 2009. For the first time, the Federal government was taking a role in setting the compensation at private corporations.  The actions resulted in an appointment of an Executive Compensation Czar within the Treasury Department to review compensation packages for companies receiving Federal assistance.

The effort did not stop here; further regulations are to follow with the enactment of the Dodd -Frank Financial Reform Legislation adopted in the Spring of 2010.  This comprehensive package of “reforms” is now the focus of new regulations (that have to be developed implementing rules of the road). Unless the 112th Congress repeals parts of the law dealing with exec comp, the Federal government will have some kind of role in the issue.  This has been welcomed by activist investors concerned about executive compensation policies and practices, especially at under-performing companies with outsized exec compensation.

In the worst cases, the focus of executive compensation packages has been upon corporate boards that are accused of being unrealistic, indifferent and in collusion with CEOs.  What became the worst criticism was the revelation that too many agreements did not tie compensation with company performance.  

“Say-on-Pay” became the rallying cry of shareholder groups and social and proxy activists as the hammer and anvil were hot and ready for hammering out reform. The Securities and Exchange Commission enacted rules for publicly-held companies to finally give a voice to shareholders through the proxy process on executive compensation.  While the votes are not binding, they do serve to create an atmosphere of greater transparency and accountability of corporate boards to their shareholders.

Still the debate over the rules goes on; matters related to CEO compensation will continue to be the focus of this section.  Whether you are located in the “C” suite or are a Corporate Secretary, Board Member, Investor Relations professional, shareholder or activist, Hot Topics Executive Compensation should be a daily stop for news, commentary and research.  

 Note:  The Editors form no judgment about the level of pay and specific compensation of Chief Executive Officers and others in the “C” Suite.  The purpose of this section is to fully air the issues surrounding exec compensation issues at shareholder-owned companies.

----------------- 

February 2008

How much should a CEO or the top executive officers of a publicly-owned corporation be paid?  What is a “fair” compensation?  Especially when corporations are laying off thousands of workers and outsourcing work to distant lands?  When the middle class is under attack – see CNN Lou Dobbs’ commentary on this?  The issue of exec comp has become a burning question with an array of forces on all sides of the issue.  When the stock market is doing well and “all boats are rising,” the issue is not as much in focus as when companies (or a single firm) is underperforming and the executive compensation is seemingly out of whack.  Out of control. Disproportionate to performance.  Unrelated to reality.  And other battle cries by investor activists, public officials, journalists, advocate organizations, etc.

Consider the case of Home Depot, where the share price fell as the CEO’s pay package rose.  Saying goodbye to the CEO, Mr. Nardelli, cost HD more than $200 million.  Consider the exiting of the Wonderful Wizards of Wall Street, and their departure comp packages – totaling in the hundreds of millions’ of dollars – as the wreckage they’ve left behind (in the form of sub prime disaster loan portfolios) causes real pain on Wall Street, and on Main Street.  We still don’t know the damage they caused with their financial wizardry – but the carnage is felt when home foreclosure rates increase dramatically, as they have over the past year.

So – what is a fair price for the Top Man (and a tiny handful of Top Women)?  You’ll find news, commentary, research and other useful content here in this Hot Topic subsection of Accountability Central, as well as in various content sections and subsections.  (See Corporate Governance, Shareowner Activism, Socially Responsible Investment, and other silos.)

Consider this as you formulate your own positions on the pay issues:

  • Aristotle believed (2400 years ago) that no Citizen of Greece, the first western democracy, should be paid more than seven (7) times that of the lowest earner.
  • The military organizes its service members in two classifications (officer and enlisted ranks), and has a well-structured pay scale (grade, steps in grade etc.) for everyone from privates to general officers and admirals.  Eight pay grades seem to cover one of the largest public institutions in America – the armed services.
  • For many years, especially in regulated industries such as airlines, telephone companies and electric utilities, the military model could often be found. The ratio of pay, say at American Airlines in the regulatory format was $60,000 in 2008 dollars for the lower rank of manager and $600,000 for CEO (10-1) – how quaint!  And consider the disastrous state of airline pay ratios today, as service crumbles and CEO pay soars like the silver-winged jet aircraft!
  • Two decades ago the executive pay system (above) began to change dramatically, and the ratio of highest-to-lowest paid moved from 10-1, or 30-to-1, or 50-to-1 to 300-to-1 or more today.  (Some CEO’s make 1,000-to-one, comparing their pay package to the lowest salaried worker.) 
  • The total pay packages of the top ranked corporate officers are so complex that even board of directors – granting the goodies – cannot understand them.  (Is this good for shareowners, who are represented by the board of directors?)
  • Beginning in January 2007, companies had to report in depth on the total pay packages of the top five (5) highest ranked decision-makers in the corporation.  This is the “CD&A” – the SEC-mandated Compensation Disclosure & Analysis.  For the first time in theory everything is on the table now for inspection, including summaries in easy-to-understand charts.  The second year’s CD&A’s will be reaching shareowners soon.  The SEC’s analysis of the quality of the first year’s disclosure was not a happy time for many of the companies issuing their first CD&A.  Will improvements be made in the Year Two disclosures (covering compensation in 2007)?  Stay Tuned!
  • Finally, many proxy contests soon to become more visible – as shareowners exercise their rights to put non-ordinary business on the shareowner-wide voting ballot – many resolutions will refer directly to or indirectly involve senior executive compensation. 

Enough highlights and commentary – we invite you to follow the often-heated discussions and public debate on executive compensation here in the pages of Accountability Central.

The Editors

 

“…People will be accountable and responsible…”

President Barack Obama – on CEO Comp – February 4, 2009

 

 


Latest on Executive Compensation

June 30, 2014 Executive Compensation at 13 Ecommerce Companies

Source: Practical ECommerce

If you’re interested in salary levels at public ecommerce companies, you can locate compensation information at the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Federal securities laws require public companies to...

June 27, 2014 Comp Committees: Facing The 2014 Proxy Season

Source: Corporate Counsel

The say-on-pay vote results to date have been positive. Around 73 percent of Russell 3000 companies received greater than a 90 percent approval rating so far, which is slightly higher than what we saw for the full 2013 proxy...

June 26, 2014 The Cost of Combining the CEO and Chairman Roles

Harvard Business Review Blogs - That same year, though, a more obscure study from îGovernanceMetricsî International, highlighted by the Harvard Law School Forum, approached the question from a different angle,...

June 26, 2014 What Drives Nonprofit Executive Compensation?

Source: NPO

When it comes to attracting and retaining talented leaders, the setting of executive compensation packages has posed continuing challenges to nonprofits since the 1980s. These challenges relate to the professionalization of the...

June 25, 2014 The CEO aristocracy: Big bucks for the big boss

Source: Washington Post

We’ve created a new economic aristocracy in the United States: CEOs. That’s a fair reading of recent corporate pay surveys. A study by compensation consultant Equilar for the New York Times finds that Charif Souki of Cheniere...

June 23, 2014 Investors speaking up on executive-compensation packages

Source: The Seattle Times

By many measures, executive pay continues to rise, especially among the largest public companies. But the dynamics between public-company boards and their shareholders have clearly changed, and performance outcomes are sometimes...

June 19, 2014 Has Coca-Cola Forged a New Path in Executive Pay? - video

Source: Bloomberg

Stanford professor Allan McCall and David Winters, founder at Wintergreen Advisers, evaluate the executive compensation plan at Coca-Cola, how the stock portion of the package differs from other major corporations and why it may...

June 18, 2014 The More A Company Pays Its CEO, The Worse Its Shareholders Do

Source: Think Progress

The companies that pay their chief executives the most see the worst results for shareholders, according to a new study, with an average annual shareholder loss of $1.4 billion at the companies with the highest CEO pay.

June 16, 2014 Great Men, great pay? Why CEO compensation is sky high.

Source: Washington Post

Why are so many chief executive compensation packages so outrageous? And why do they continue to roar ahead of most workers’ pay? According to data released this month by executive-salary tracker Equilar, the 200 most highly...

June 12, 2014 Financial executive compensation takes a turn for the better

Source: efinancial careers

If you’re a CFO, controller or VP of finance, the job market is looking as good as it has in years. Job openings and pay for non-banking finance executives are both on the rise. The average salary for financial executives at...

Displaying results 11 to 20 out of 1579
HOME | ABOUT THE SITE | REGISTRATION INFORMATION | VOICES: FEATURED COMMENTATORS AND BLOGGERS  | SPECIAL SECTIONS

Published by

TM

Published by Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc.
Design & Contents Copyright © 2005 - 2014
By G&A Institute unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
Accountability-Central is a service mark of G&A Institute, Inc.
New York, New York, USA

Email info@ga-institute.com | Web www.ga-institute.com